← Competition scorecard

JUDGE ANALYSIS

South Lyon East

Lake Orion Marching Band Invitational · Oct 17, 2026 · Flight II

THE PANEL AT A GLANCE

Historical panel outlook: Generous

Factoring in the judges' histories with South Lyon East, the panel averages +1.259 percentage points versus this band's other-judge benchmarks.

7 of 9 assigned judges have comparable history.

Provisional: some judges have limited or missing history.

Each judge counts once, with equal weight, using the overall-history column below. Missing history is excluded, not treated as Fair. This is a historical outlook, not a predicted score.

The assigned panel's historical scoring tendencies towards this band. Overall uses all categories; the category column uses only the category listed under that judge.

Judge / assigned categoryHistorical vs band — overallHistorical vs band — category
Best, J.Percussion Historically Fair -0.458 percentage points4 matched scores · 4 competitions Small sample: fewer than five matched scores or two competitions. Historically Fair -0.458 percentage points4 matched scores · 4 competitions Small sample: fewer than five matched scores or two competitions.
Brown, M.General Effect - Music Historically Generous +10.125 percentage points1 matched scores · 1 competitions Small sample: fewer than five matched scores or two competitions. Historically Generous +10.125 percentage points1 matched scores · 1 competitions Small sample: fewer than five matched scores or two competitions.
Cort, K.Music - Individual Historically Fair +0.500 percentage points1 matched scores · 1 competitions Small sample: fewer than five matched scores or two competitions. Historically Fair +0.500 percentage points1 matched scores · 1 competitions Small sample: fewer than five matched scores or two competitions.
Swiney, A.Penalty Not enough comparable history 0 matched scores · 0 competitions Not enough comparable history 0 matched scores · 0 competitions
VanDam, C.Visual - Individual Historically Strict -2.983 percentage points2 matched scores · 2 competitions Small sample: fewer than five matched scores or two competitions. Historically Generous +4.700 percentage points1 matched scores · 1 competitions Small sample: fewer than five matched scores or two competitions.
Yoskovich, M.Auxiliary Historically Generous +4.778 percentage points3 matched scores · 3 competitions Small sample: fewer than five matched scores or two competitions. Historically Fair -0.667 percentage points1 matched scores · 1 competitions Small sample: fewer than five matched scores or two competitions.
Heather, MarkVisual - Ensemble Historically Strict -5.533 percentage points2 matched scores · 2 competitions Small sample: fewer than five matched scores or two competitions. Historically Strict -10.400 percentage points1 matched scores · 1 competitions Small sample: fewer than five matched scores or two competitions.
Hollandsworth, M.Music - Ensemble Historically Generous +2.388 percentage points4 matched scores · 4 competitions Small sample: fewer than five matched scores or two competitions. Historically Generous +6.750 percentage points1 matched scores · 1 competitions Small sample: fewer than five matched scores or two competitions.
Stevens, M.General Effect - Visual Not enough comparable history 0 matched scores · 0 competitions Not enough comparable history 0 matched scores · 0 competitions

Each score is compared with this band's other-judge average for the same season, flight, category, measure, and maximum at other competitions. Differences are normalized to percentage points of the measure's maximum. Generous means above +1; Strict means below −1; Fair means within ±1. Missing comparable history receives no label.

Only scored performances before this competition's date and no later than today are used, across all prior seasons. This competition and later results cannot influence its analysis. Overall-only live totals, exhibitions, penalties, and unattributed scores are excluded. A judge covering multiple categories appears once per assignment. Judge links open the full historical comparison page.

These are historical tendencies, not predicted scores or a determination of fairness. Show development, contest conditions, and small samples can affect the comparison.