← Competition scorecard

JUDGE ANALYSIS

Jenison

Portage Northern Marching Band Invitational · Oct 24, 2026 · Flight II

THE PANEL AT A GLANCE

Historical panel outlook: Strict

Factoring in the judges' histories with Jenison, the panel averages -1.264 percentage points versus this band's other-judge benchmarks.

6 of 9 assigned judges have comparable history.

Provisional: some judges have limited or missing history.

Each judge counts once, with equal weight, using the overall-history column below. Missing history is excluded, not treated as Fair. This is a historical outlook, not a predicted score.

The assigned panel's historical scoring tendencies towards this band. Overall uses all categories; the category column uses only the category listed under that judge.

Judge / assigned categoryHistorical vs band — overallHistorical vs band — category
Best, J.Percussion Historically Generous +6.250 percentage points1 matched scores · 1 competitions Small sample: fewer than five matched scores or two competitions. Historically Generous +6.250 percentage points1 matched scores · 1 competitions Small sample: fewer than five matched scores or two competitions.
Clum, C.Auxiliary Not enough comparable history 0 matched scores · 0 competitions Not enough comparable history 0 matched scores · 0 competitions
Dessent, CGeneral Effect - Music Not enough comparable history 0 matched scores · 0 competitions Not enough comparable history 0 matched scores · 0 competitions
DeVoe, J.Penalty Not enough comparable history 0 matched scores · 0 competitions Not enough comparable history 0 matched scores · 0 competitions
Gropp, N.Visual - Individual Historically Strict -4.333 percentage points1 matched scores · 1 competitions Small sample: fewer than five matched scores or two competitions. Historically Strict -4.333 percentage points1 matched scores · 1 competitions Small sample: fewer than five matched scores or two competitions.
Trimpe, J.R.Music - Individual Historically Generous +1.333 percentage points1 matched scores · 1 competitions Small sample: fewer than five matched scores or two competitions. Historically Generous +1.333 percentage points1 matched scores · 1 competitions Small sample: fewer than five matched scores or two competitions.
Burgan, J.Visual - Ensemble Historically Fair -0.833 percentage points1 matched scores · 1 competitions Small sample: fewer than five matched scores or two competitions. Not enough comparable history 0 matched scores · 0 competitions
Colaianni, VictorMusic - Ensemble Historically Strict -5.500 percentage points1 matched scores · 1 competitions Small sample: fewer than five matched scores or two competitions. Not enough comparable history 0 matched scores · 0 competitions
Dobis, J.General Effect - Visual Historically Strict -4.500 percentage points1 matched scores · 1 competitions Small sample: fewer than five matched scores or two competitions. Historically Strict -4.500 percentage points1 matched scores · 1 competitions Small sample: fewer than five matched scores or two competitions.

Each score is compared with this band's other-judge average for the same season, flight, category, measure, and maximum at other competitions. Differences are normalized to percentage points of the measure's maximum. Generous means above +1; Strict means below −1; Fair means within ±1. Missing comparable history receives no label.

Only scored performances before this competition's date and no later than today are used, across all prior seasons. This competition and later results cannot influence its analysis. Overall-only live totals, exhibitions, penalties, and unattributed scores are excluded. A judge covering multiple categories appears once per assignment. Judge links open the full historical comparison page.

These are historical tendencies, not predicted scores or a determination of fairness. Show development, contest conditions, and small samples can affect the comparison.