← Competition scorecard

JUDGE ANALYSIS

Godwin Hts

Sparta Marching Band Invitational · Oct 11, 2025 · Flight IV

THE PANEL AT A GLANCE

Historical panel outlook: Strict

Factoring in the judges' histories with Godwin Hts, the panel averages -1.240 percentage points versus this band's other-judge benchmarks.

5 of 9 assigned judges have comparable history.

Provisional: some judges have limited or missing history.

Each judge counts once, with equal weight, using the overall-history column below. Missing history is excluded, not treated as Fair. This is a historical outlook, not a predicted score.

The assigned panel's historical scoring tendencies towards this band. Overall uses all categories; the category column uses only the category listed under that judge.

Judge / assigned categoryHistorical vs band — overallHistorical vs band — category
Colaianni, VictorPercussion Historically Strict -11.000 percentage points1 matched scores · 1 competitions Small sample: fewer than five matched scores or two competitions. Historically Strict -11.000 percentage points1 matched scores · 1 competitions Small sample: fewer than five matched scores or two competitions.
DeVoe, J.Penalty Not enough comparable history 0 matched scores · 0 competitions Not enough comparable history 0 matched scores · 0 competitions
Domcik, N.Auxiliary Not enough comparable history 0 matched scores · 0 competitions Not enough comparable history 0 matched scores · 0 competitions
Gentry, C.Visual - Individual Not enough comparable history 0 matched scores · 0 competitions Not enough comparable history 0 matched scores · 0 competitions
Haines, P.General Effect - Music Historically Fair -0.750 percentage points1 matched scores · 1 competitions Small sample: fewer than five matched scores or two competitions. Historically Fair -0.750 percentage points1 matched scores · 1 competitions Small sample: fewer than five matched scores or two competitions.
Stice, MarkMusic - Individual Historically Strict -1.763 percentage points2 matched scores · 2 competitions Small sample: fewer than five matched scores or two competitions. Historically Strict -1.763 percentage points2 matched scores · 2 competitions Small sample: fewer than five matched scores or two competitions.
Pickett, DaveVisual - Ensemble Historically Generous +2.313 percentage points2 matched scores · 2 competitions Small sample: fewer than five matched scores or two competitions. Historically Strict -2.375 percentage points1 matched scores · 1 competitions Small sample: fewer than five matched scores or two competitions.
Tarr, MikeGeneral Effect - Visual Not enough comparable history 0 matched scores · 0 competitions Not enough comparable history 0 matched scores · 0 competitions
Trimpe, J.R.Music - Ensemble Historically Generous +5.000 percentage points1 matched scores · 1 competitions Small sample: fewer than five matched scores or two competitions. Not enough comparable history 0 matched scores · 0 competitions

Each score is compared with this band's other-judge average for the same season, flight, category, measure, and maximum at other competitions. Differences are normalized to percentage points of the measure's maximum. Generous means above +1; Strict means below −1; Fair means within ±1. Missing comparable history receives no label.

Only scored performances before this competition's date and no later than today are used, across all prior seasons. This competition and later results cannot influence its analysis. Overall-only live totals, exhibitions, penalties, and unattributed scores are excluded. A judge covering multiple categories appears once per assignment. Judge links open the full historical comparison page.

These are historical tendencies, not predicted scores or a determination of fairness. Show development, contest conditions, and small samples can affect the comparison.